Peters vs. Fuller

In a November 2005 article for The American Surveyor, Angus Stocking considers — and compares — two “alternative” map projections: the Gall-Peters projection, proselytized by Arno Peters, and the icosahedral Dymaxion projection by Buckminster Fuller. To put it mildly, he prefers the latter to the former: “[I]t’s a shame that [Fuller’s] unique map is not better known, and almost a crime that the relatively clumsy Gall-Peters projection seems to have displaced it as an educational tool and wall map. All of Peters’ stated goals — fairness, equality, non-bias — are better achieved by Fuller’s simple, elegant and brilliant creation.”

Previously: Review: Seeing Through Maps; New Edition of Seeing Through Maps; Dymaxion Map Projection; The Peters Projection.

Posted on Monday, June 18, 2007 at 12:24 PM
Categories: Map Projections

Comments

No comments have been posted to this entry. It is more than 30 days old and is closed to new comments.

Comments on all entries are available via RSS.